<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE vs. Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davinciunltd.com/2008/03/ie-vs-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davinciunltd.com/2008/03/ie-vs-standards/</link>
	<description>Jim McKeeth's blog on creative and innovative Delphi programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:04:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: d.cornelius</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciunltd.com/2008/03/ie-vs-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>d.cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciunltd.com/2008/03/ie-vs-standards/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a &quot;best practices&quot; person, so I&#039;ll always vote for the idealistic method.  Yeah, it&#039;s gonna hurt; yeah, there will be pages that won&#039;t work any more; yeah, there&#039;s going to be lots of effort to fix everything.  Too bad, it should&#039;ve been done right in the first place.  Or maybe it&#039;s not that it wasn&#039;t done right in the first place, but that there&#039;s just a newer, better way to do it and we should throw away the old code.  It&#039;s helpful to review everything once in a while anyway.

The content management system I chose to build my web site in, Drupal, is based on this concept.  I recently had to do a major overhaul of my site and a client&#039;s site just to get them to up-to-date with the latest version of Drupal so that the site would be ready for PHP 5.  I&#039;d rather have to do that work and know I&#039;m keeping up with technology, than to have to bring along baggage of old routines.

There was an unexepected benefit of updating the web sites.  I learned about some new modules that were available and changed the data structures to accomodate them which will actually give me more flexibility.  If I hadn&#039;t needed to update the sites, I wouldn&#039;t have discovered these new features.

And I have dealt with changed Indy functions in a Delphi program.  I work for a boss that only cares if it is working--we gotta move on to the next project (&quot;if the old version worked, and we have a program similar to this new project, copy it and make it work.&quot;).  Every fiber of me goes against that concept.  However, it&#039;s also why I&#039;m not in business for myself anymore.  I spent too much time &quot;doing it right&quot; rather than &quot;getting it done.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a &#8220;best practices&#8221; person, so I&#8217;ll always vote for the idealistic method.  Yeah, it&#8217;s gonna hurt; yeah, there will be pages that won&#8217;t work any more; yeah, there&#8217;s going to be lots of effort to fix everything.  Too bad, it should&#8217;ve been done right in the first place.  Or maybe it&#8217;s not that it wasn&#8217;t done right in the first place, but that there&#8217;s just a newer, better way to do it and we should throw away the old code.  It&#8217;s helpful to review everything once in a while anyway.</p>
<p>The content management system I chose to build my web site in, Drupal, is based on this concept.  I recently had to do a major overhaul of my site and a client&#8217;s site just to get them to up-to-date with the latest version of Drupal so that the site would be ready for PHP 5.  I&#8217;d rather have to do that work and know I&#8217;m keeping up with technology, than to have to bring along baggage of old routines.</p>
<p>There was an unexepected benefit of updating the web sites.  I learned about some new modules that were available and changed the data structures to accomodate them which will actually give me more flexibility.  If I hadn&#8217;t needed to update the sites, I wouldn&#8217;t have discovered these new features.</p>
<p>And I have dealt with changed Indy functions in a Delphi program.  I work for a boss that only cares if it is working&#8211;we gotta move on to the next project (&#8221;if the old version worked, and we have a program similar to this new project, copy it and make it work.&#8221;).  Every fiber of me goes against that concept.  However, it&#8217;s also why I&#8217;m not in business for myself anymore.  I spent too much time &#8220;doing it right&#8221; rather than &#8220;getting it done.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xepol</title>
		<link>http://www.davinciunltd.com/2008/03/ie-vs-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Xepol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davinciunltd.com/2008/03/ie-vs-standards/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Short term pain for long term gain.  About time someone embraced the concept.

Doesn&#039;t matter what MS does anymore, the same people bitch.  They don&#039;t even care if they make sense anymore.  IE doesn&#039;t adhear to standards and breaks everything, IE adhears to standards and breaks everything.

It isn&#039;t about the pragmatists vs the idealist, it is all about bashing MS.  Enough is bloody enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short term pain for long term gain.  About time someone embraced the concept.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t matter what MS does anymore, the same people bitch.  They don&#8217;t even care if they make sense anymore.  IE doesn&#8217;t adhear to standards and breaks everything, IE adhears to standards and breaks everything.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t about the pragmatists vs the idealist, it is all about bashing MS.  Enough is bloody enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
